A participatory, territory-rooted and change-oriented approach to assess the multi-criteria contribution of an agrifood value chain to sustainable development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52394/ijolcas.v3i1.84Abstract
Agrifood Value chains (AVCs) can be powerful driving forces for sustainable development. Multi-criteria analysis is particularly useful for supporting decision making on improvement measures in AVCs. Methodological guidelines are still needed to effectively integrate environmental and socio-economical assessment tools and indicators at this level.
In this paper, we propose a participatory, territory-rooted and change-oriented framework. The framework is applied to analyse the contribution of the main local poultry AVC in Reunion Island to the sustainable development of the territory. The main stakeholders of the AVC participated in (i) identifying key territory challenges, (ii) selecting corresponding appropriate assessment methods and indicators, (iii) defining the perimeter of the AVC and (iv) the improvement scenarios to be explored, v) providing data inventory, and vi) interpreting the results of the assessment.
Both the environmental life cycle assessment and the effect method fit the proposed framework particularly well. They were applied to the same AVC data inventory, improvement scenarios were explored and indicators were spatialized to distinguish the local impacts in the root territory and externalized impacts at the global scale.
In the ecological dimension of our case study, most of the effects linked to the AVC activities which threaten resources conservation and ecosystem health are externalized. This is due to strong dependency on foreign resources: in the case of fossil energy and raw materials used for livestock feed, 82% of environmental impacts occur outside Reunion Island. In the socio-economic dimension, the employment created by the AVC is mainly local due to the use of local services, 89% of jobs are provided in Reunion Island. Improvement of on-farm eco-efficiency was shown to be a mitigation option that would significantly affect the impacts of the AVC. Human and ecosystem health, and resources conservation would be improved by respectively +2.2, +9.8 and +4.8,% at global scale. But the AVC industrial network and the community would also be negatively affected, by respectively -2.2 and -3.0%, at local scale. This study underlines trade-offs between the environmental and the socio-economic dimensions and methodological challenges associated with the effective integration of assessment methods originating from diverse disciplines.
References
Arcese, G., Lucchetti, M.C., Massa, I., Valente, C., 2018. State of the art in S-LCA: integrating literature review and automatic text analysis. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 23, 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1082-0
Asman, W. A. H., Sutton, M. A.,SchjØRring, J. K. 1998. Ammonia: emission, atmospheric transport and deposition. New Phytologist 139 (1):27-48. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00180.x.
Aubin, J., Donnars, C., Supkova, M., Le Perchec, S.,Dorin, B. 2011. Méthodes d’évaluation. Panorama critique, in : duALIne - durabilité de l’alimentation face à de nouveaux enjeux. Questions à la recherche, Esnouf, C., Russel, M. et Bricas, N. (Coords.): Rapport Inra-Cirad (France).
Audsley, A., Alber, S., Clift, R., Cowell, S., Crettaz, R., Gaillard, G., Hausheer, J., Jolliett, O., Kleijn, R., Mortensen, B., Pearce, D., Roger, E., Teulon, H., Weidema, B., van Zeijts, H., 1997. Harmonisation of environmental life cycle assessment for agriculture, Final report, Concerted Action AIR3-CT94-2028. European Commission DG VI, Brussels, Belgium.
Beretta, C., Stucki, M., Hellweg, S., 2017. Environmental Impacts and Hotspots of Food Losses: Value Chain Analysis of Swiss Food Consumption. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 11165–11173. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06179
Bidault, F. 1988. Le Champ stratégique de l'entreprise. Économica. Paris, 365 p.
Barham, E. 2003. Translating terroir: the global challenge of French AOC labeling. Journal of Rural Studies 19 (1):127-138. doi:10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00052-9
Chervel, M., Fabre, P., Kane, R., Saldarriaga, G., 1997. Manuel d'évaluation de projets d'investissement par la méthode des effets. Orbiter.
Chervel, M.,Le Gall, M. 1976. Manuel d’évaluation économique des projets –La méthode des effets. Paris: SEDES, Ministère de la coopération
Coulibaly D., Corniaux C., Poccard Chapuis R., Sidibé S.I., C.H., M., 2007. Changes in the Feeding Strategies of Cattle Herds in the Dairy Basin of the City of Sikasso in Mali. Revue Élev. Méd. vét. Pays trop. 60, 103-111.
Eakin, H.,Luers, A. L. 2006. Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31:365-394. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144352.
Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Zyglidopoulos, S., 2018. Stakeholder Theory: Concepts and Strategies, Elements in Organization Theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108539500
Frischknecht, R., Jungbluth, N., Althaus, H.-J., Doka, G., Dones, R., Heck, T., Hellweg, S., Hischier, R., Nemecek, T., Rebitzer, G., 2005. The ecoinvent database: Overview and methodological framework (7 pp). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10, 3-9.
Gerber, P.J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G., 2013. Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
Godard, C., Boissy, J., Gabrielle, B., 2013. Life-cycle assessment of local feedstock supply scenarios to compare candidate biomass sources. Gcb Bioenergy 5, 16–29.
Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., De Schryver, A., Struijs, J., van Zelm, R., 2009. ReCiPe 2008: A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. VROM–Ruimte en Milieu, Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, www. lcia-recipe. net.
Govindan, K., 2013. Embedding sustainability dynamics in supply chain relationship management and governance structures. J. Clean. Prod. 59, 1–2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.047
Goldstein, W.M., Hogarth, R.M., 1997. Research on Judgment and Decision Making: Currents, Connections, and Controversies. Cambridge University Press.
Grandval Samuel, HIKMI Ahmed, 2005. L'apport de la théorie des jeux à la démarche d'analyse stratégique. Vie & sciences de l'entreprise N° 168 - 169, 6-19.
Grießhammer, R., Benoît, C., Dreyer, L.C., Flysjö, A., Manhart, A., Mazijn,B., Méthot, A.L, Weidema, B. 2006. Feasibility Study: Integration of social aspects into LCA. Freiburg, Germay. 14 pp. Available at http://www.saiplatform.org/uploads/Library/UNEP-SETACLifeCycleInitiativeTFonSocialIssues-FeasibilityStudy.pdf
Guérin-Schneider, L., Tsanga-Tabi, M., Roux, P., Catel, L., Biard, Y., 2018. How to better include environmental assessment in public decision-making: Lessons from the use of an LCA-calculator for wastewater systems. J. Clean. Prod. 187, 1057–1068. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.168
Guinee, J. B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P., Buonamici, R., Ekvall, T.,Rydberg, T. 2011. Life Cycle Assessment: Past, Present, and Futures. Environmental Science & Technology 45 (1):90-96. doi:10.1021/Es101316v.
Guinée, J.B., Gorrée, M., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Kleijn, R., de Koning, A., van Oers, L., Wegener Sleeswijk, A., Suh, S., Udo de Haes, H.A., de Bruijn, H., van Duin, R., Huijbregts, M.A.J., 2002. Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment. An Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
IIAM, 2011. http://www.iiam.gov.mz. Instituto de Investigaçao Agraria de Moçambique.
INSEE, 2007. Enquête budget de famille 2006 en France, in: INSEE (Ed.).
INSEE, 2010a. Comptes Économiques Régionaux définitifs de La Réunion 2007 - Base 1995 - Tableaux de synthèse : TES et TEE in: INSEE (Ed.). INSEE.
INSEE, 2010b. Enquête Budget de famille 2006 à La Réunion, in: INSEE (Ed.).
INSEE, 2010c. Les comptes de la Nation 2007 - Base 2005 - Tableaux de synthèse : TES et TEE in: INSEE (Ed.). INSEE.
Isard, W. 1951. Interregional and regional input-output analysis: a model of a space-economy. The Review of Economics and Statistics 33 (4):318-328
Jørgensen, A., Le Bocq, A., Nazarkina, L., Hauschild, M., 2007. Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13, 96. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.11.367
Jouini, M., Biard, Y., Benaissa, N., Burte, J., Amara, H., Sinfort, C., 2018. Environmental Impact Evaluation of Cropping Systems Using Life Cycle Assessment: Case Study of Central Tunisia, in: Kallel, A., Ksibi, M., Ben Dhia, H., Khélifi, N. (Eds.), Recent Advances in Environmental Science from the Euro-Mediterranean and Surrounding Regions. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 287–289.
Kulak, M., Nemecek, T., Frossard, E., Chable, V., Gaillard, G., 2015. Life cycle assessment of bread from several alternative food networks in Europe. J. Clean. Prod. 90, 104–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.060
Lagarde, V.,Macombe, C. 2013. Designing the social life cycle of products from the systematic competitive model. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 18 (1):172-184. doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0448-1
Laganier Richard, Villalba Bruno,Zuindeau Bertrand. 2002. Le développement durable face au territoire : éléments pour une recherche pluridisciplinaire. Développement durable et territoires Dossier 1. doi:10.4000/developpementdurable.774.
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M.,Thomas, C. J. 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science 7:25-43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
Leontief, W., 1936. Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics 18, 105-125.
Loiseau, E., Aissani, L., Féon, S. Le, Laurent, F., Cerceau, J., Sala, S., Roux, P., 2018. Territorial Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): What exactly is it about? A proposal towards using a common terminology and a research agenda. J. Clean. Prod. 176, 474–485. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.169
Loiseau, E., Roux, P., Junqua, G., Maurel, P., Bellon-Maurel, V., 2014. Implementation of an adapted LCA framework to environmental assessment of a territory: important learning points from a French Mediterranean case study. J. Clean. Prod. 80, 17–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.059
Loorbach, D., van Bakel, J. C., Whiteman, G.,Rotmans, J. 2010. Business Strategies for Transitions Towards Sustainable Systems. Business Strategy and the Environment 19 (2):133-146. doi:10.1002/Bse.645.
Miller, R. E.,Blair, P. D. 2009. Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions. Cambridge University Press. New York. 746 pp. ISBN-13 978-0-511-65103-8
Nemecek, T., Huguenin-Elie, O., Dubois, D., Gaillard, G., Schaller, B., Chervet, A., 2011. Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems: II. Extensive and intensive production. Agric. Syst. 104, 233–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.007
Nemecek, T., Kägi, T., 2007. Life Cycle Inventories of Swiss and European Agricultural Production Systems, Final report ecoinvent V2.0 No. 15a. Agroscope Reckenholz-Taenikon Research Station ART, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Zurich and Dübendorf, CH.
Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S.,Olsson, L. 2007. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics 60 (3):498-508. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023
Nitschelm, L., Aubin, J., Corson, M.S., Viaud, V., Walter, C., 2016. Spatial differentiation in Life Cycle Assessment LCA applied to an agricultural territory: current practices and method development. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 2472–2484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.138
Petit, G., Sablayrolles, C., Bris, G.Y.-L., 2018. Combining eco-social and environmental indicators to assess the sustainability performance of a food value chain: A case study. J. Clean. Prod. 191, 135–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.156
Phillips, R. A.,Reichart, J. 2000. The environment as a stakeholder? A fairness-based approach. Journal of Business Ethics 23 (2):185-197. doi:10.1023/A:1006041929249.
Ploquin, L., 2011. Approche filière et chaîne logistique : complémentarité de leurs apports dans l’analyse des flux et des relations entre acteurs. -Le cas de la filière avicole réunionnaise. Mémoire de fin d'études, CIRAD Pôle Elevage, Saint-Pierre, Réunion.
Poccard-Chapuis R., Corniaux C., Coulibaly, D. 2007. Structuring of Milk Production Basins: Comparison between Brazilian Amazonia and Mali. Revue Élev. Méd. vét. Pays trop. 60, 141-152.
Pollesch, N., Dale, V.H., 2015. Applications of aggregation theory to sustainability assessment. Ecol. Econ. 114, 117–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.011
Porter, T. B. 2006. Coevolution as a research framework for organizations and the natural environment. Organization & Environment 19 (4):479-504. doi:10.1177/1086026606294958
PRé Consultants, 2008. PRé Consultants. B.V. Printerweg 18, 3821 AD Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Rastoin, J., Ghersi, G. (2010). Le système alimentaire mondial: Concepts et méthodes, analyses et dynamiques. Versailles, France: Editions Quæ. doi:10.3917/quae.rasto.2010.01.
Renting, H., Marsden, T. K.,Banks, J. 2003. Understanding alternative food networks: exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and planning A 35 (3):393-412
Rothschild, W. 1984. How to gain (and maintain) the competitive advantage in business. McGraw-Hill, New York
Rowley, H. V, Peters, G.M., Lundie, S., Moore, S.J., 2012. Aggregating sustainability indicators: Beyond the weighted sum. J. Environ. Manage. 111, 24–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.05.004
Sargento, A. L. M. 2009. Regional input-output tables and models: interregional trade estimation and input-output modelling based on total use rectangular tables
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K.,Dikshit, A. K. 2012. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators 15 (1):281-299. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007.
Sleeswijk, A.W., van Oers, L.F.C.M., Guinee, J.B., Struijs, J., Huijbregts, M.A.J., 2008. Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: An LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000. Sci Total Environ 390, 227-240.
Schöggl, J.-P., Fritz, M.M.C., Baumgartner, R.J., 2016. Toward supply chain-wide sustainability assessment: a conceptual framework and an aggregation method to assess supply chain performance. J. Clean. Prod. 131, 822–835. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.035
Tansey, G., Worsley, T., 1995. The food system: a guide. Earthscan Publications Ltd. 259 pp.
Swisher, M.E., Ruiz-Menjivar, J., Koenig, R., 2018. Value chains in renewable and sustainable food systems. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 33, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000667
Testa, S., 2011. Internationalization patterns among speciality food companies: some Italian case study evidence. Brit Food J 113, 1406-1426.
Thanawong, K., Perret, S.R., Basset-Mens, C., 2014. Eco-efficiency of paddy rice production in Northeastern Thailand: a comparison of rain-fed and irrigated cropping systems. J. Clean. Prod. 73, 204–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.067
Thévenot, A. 2014. A new conceptual framework to assess the contribution of agricultural supply chain to sustainable developpment of territories - case study on the main poultry supply chain in Reunion Island. Université de la Réunion, 2014. Français. PhD thesis. Available at : https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01223106/document
Thévenot, A., Aubin, J., Tillard, E., Vayssières, J., 2013. Accounting for farm diversity in Life Cycle Assessment studies – the case of poultry production in a tropical island. Journal of Cleaner Production 57, 280-292.
Thévenot A., Vayssières J., 2011. Towards the use of LCA as an approach to evaluate contribution of agriculture to sustainable development. In: LCM 2011 international Life Cycle Management Conference, Berlin, Germany, August 28-31, 7 pp.
Townsend, Robert; Ronchi, Loraine; Brett, Chris; Moses, Gene. 2018. Future of Food : Maximizing Finance for Development in Agricultural Value Chains. World Bank, Washington, DC. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29686 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
Ullah, A., Perret, S.R., Gheewala, S.H., Soni, P., 2016. Eco-efficiency of cotton-cropping systems in Pakistan: an integrated approach of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 134, 623–632. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.112
UNEP, 2009. United Nations Environment Programme. Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Available at URL: http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1164xPA-guidelines_SLCA.pdf
Vayssières J., Vigne M., Alary V., Lecomte P., 2011. Integrated participatory modelling of actual farms to support policy making on sustainable intensification. Agricultural Systems 104, 146–161.
Watts, D. C. H., Ilbery, B.,Maye, D. 2005. Making reconnections in agro-food geography: alternative systems of food provision. Progress in Human Geography 29 (1):22-40. doi:10.1191/0309132505ph526oa.
Vitousek, P.M., Naylor, R., Crews, T., David, M.B., Drinkwater, L.E., Holland, E., Johnes, P.J., Katzenberger, J., Martinelli, L.A., Matson, P.A., Nziguheba, G., Ojima, D., Palm, C.A., Robertson, G.P., Sanchez, P.A., Townsend, A.R., Zhang, F.S., 2009. Nutrient Imbalances in Agricultural Development. Science 324, 1519-1520.
Wrisberg, N., de Haes, H., Triebswetter, U., Eder, P., Clift, R., 2002. Analytical Tools for Environmental Design and Management in a Systems Perspective: The Combined Use of Analytical Tools. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0456-5
Zeghal, D., Mhedhbi, K., 2006. An analysis of the factors affecting the adoption of international accounting standards by developing countries. The International Journal of Accounting 41, 373-386.
Published
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
