Towards a Region-Specific Impact Assessment of Water Degradation In Water Footprinting

Authors

  • Natalia Finogenova Technische Universitaet Berlin, Chair of Sustainable Engineering http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4354-6367
  • Markus Berger Technische Universitaet Berlin, Chair of Sustainable Engineering
  • Lennart Schelter Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management (IWW), RWTH Aachen University
  • Rike Becker IWW Water Centre, Department of Water Resources Management
  • Tim aus der Beek IWW Water Centre, Department of Water Resources Management
  • Muhammad Usman Remote Sensing Unit, University of Wuerzburg
  • Frank-Andreas Weber Forschungsinstitut für Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft an der RWTH Aachen (FiW) e.V
  • Matthias Finkbeiner Technische Universitaet Berlin, Chair of Sustainable Engineering

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52394/ijolcas.v2i1.82

Abstract

Water footprint evaluates impacts associated with the water use along a product’s life cycle. In order to quantify impacts resulting from water pollution in a comprehensive manner, impact categories, such as human toxicity, were developed in the context of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Nevertheless, methods addressing human health impacts often have a low spatial resolution and, thus, are not able to model impacts on a local scale. To address this issue, we develop a region-specific model for the human toxicity impacts for the cotton-textile industry in Punjab, Pakistan. We analysed local cause-effect chains and created a region “Punjab” in the USEtox model using local climate, landscape, and population data. Finally, we calculated human health impacts for the emissions of pesticides from the cotton cultivation and heavy metals from the textile production. The results were compared to that obtained for the region India+ (where Pakistan belongs) provided by USEtox. The overall result obtained for Punjab is higher than that for India+. In Punjab, the dominant pathway is ingestion via drinking water, which contributes to two-thirds of the total impacts. Nevertheless, the USEtox model does not reflect the local cause-effect chains completely due to absence of the groundwater compartment. Since groundwater is the main source for drinking in Punjab, a more detailed analysis of the fate of and exposure to the pollutants is needed. This study demonstrates that a region-specific assessment of the water quality aspects is essential to provide a more robust evaluation of the human health impacts within water footprinting.

References

United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals. (2018). Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs

OECD. Water. OECD Environmental outlook to 2050: The Consequences of inaction (2012). doi:10.1787/9789264122246

UNEP. A Snapshot of the World ’ s Water Quality : Towards a global assessment. (2016)

Waseem, A. et al. Pollution Status of Pakistan: A RetrospectiveReview on Heavy Metal Contamination of Water, Soil, and Vegetables. Biomed Res. Int. 2014, (2014)

Afzal, M. et al. Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination in Soil and Groundwater at Leather Industrial Area of Kasur, Pakistan. Clean - Soil, Air, Water 42, 1133–1139 (2014)

Azizullah, A., Khattak, M. N. K., Richter, P. & Häder, D.-P. Water pollution in Pakistan and its impact on public health — A review. Environ. Int. 37, 479–497 (2011)

ISO. Water footprint — Principles, requirements and guidance. International Organization for Standardization, Ed. (2014)

Berger, M. et al. Enhancing the water accounting and vulnerability evaluation model: WAVE+. Environ. Sci. Technol. (2018). doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b05164

Berger, M., Van Der Ent, R., Eisner, S., Bach, V. & Finkbeiner, M. Water accounting and vulnerability evaluation (WAVE): Considering atmospheric evaporation recycling and the risk of freshwater depletion in water footprinting. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 4521–4528 (2014)

Boulay, A. M. et al. The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 1–11 (2017). doi:10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8

Pfister, S., Koehler, A. & Hellweg, S. Assessing the Environmental Impact of Freshwater Consumption in Life Cycle Assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 4098–4104 (2009)

Mekonnen, M. M. & Hoekstra, A. Y. Global Gray Water Footprint and Water Pollution Levels Related to Anthropogenic Nitrogen Loads to Fresh Water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 12860–12868 (2015)

ISO. Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Ed. (2006)

ISO. Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Ed. (2006)

Boulay, A.-M. et al. Analysis of water use impact assessment methods (part B): applicability for water footprinting and decision making with a laundry case study. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 20, 865–879 (2015)

Rosenbaum, R. K. et al. USEtox - The UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: Recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13, 532–546 (2008)

Rosenbaum, R. K. et al. USEtox human exposure and toxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: Sensitivity to key chemical properties. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16, 710–727 (2011)

Henderson, A. D. et al. USEtox fate and ecotoxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: Sensitivity to key chemical properties. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16, 701–709 (2011)

Bureau of Statistics. Punjab Development Statistics 2015. (2015)

Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS OF PAKISTAN 2011-2012. (2011)

InoCottonGRoW. (2018). Available at: https://www.inocottongrow.net/. (Accessed: 1st September 2018)

European Commission. PEFCR Guidance document, - Guidance for the development of Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCRs), version 6.3. (2017)

Manzoor, S., Shah, M. H., Shaheen, N., Khalique, A. & Jaffar, M. Multivariate analysis of trace metals in textile effluents in relation to soil and groundwater. J. Hazard. Mater. 137, 31–37 (2006)

Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. Pakistan Social and living standards measurement survey (2015-15). (2016)

Downloads

Published

2019-04-12

Issue

Vol 2, No 1 (2018)

Section

Articles

License


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License